<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>What is the legitimacy of harvesting social media to feed the facial recognition algorithm?</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>What is the lawful basis of processing personal data very possibility sensitive data as our recognisable pictures?</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Recital 51: “Those personal data should include personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, whereby the use of the term ‘racial origin’”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>photographs should not systematically be considered to be processing of SC of PD as they are covered by the definition of biometric data only when processed through a specific technical means allowing the unique identification or authentication of a natural person.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Non Facebook users have no expectation that their pictures will be used by FB . LI might not stand</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Liliane :&nbsp;That shld be illegal imho tho legit interests vaguely poss ( but not if it is biometric). ( do non Fb users get tagged? Never happens on photos on my Fb)</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>EERke the person in the picture might not even be a FB user. The facial recognition algorithm may fail to recognise them, or recognise them as an earlier hit from same person, (and not generate a tagging suggestion,) but no explicit consent in place.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Liliane I'd argue by analogy w recital 51 that a pic only "reveals" racial data ( say) where it is being specifically processed to identify a person acc to that variable, otherwise again reduction ad absurdio But see Obiter in Uk Murray v Big Picture para 80 ( handily looking up own bk.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->